Fischer vs. Larsen, 1958, Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack

ChessBaseやHiarcsでのPGN(Portable Game Notations)の入力・編集がわかってきたので,試しに書籍の内容を入力してみた。サンプルとして選んだのは,Bobby FischerのMy 60 Memorable Gamesから,Bent Larsenとの一戦。書籍の文章を,ほぼそのままPGNに埋め込んでみた。

WordPressのプラグインも悪くないのだが,ChessBaseがPGNのPreviewerをWeb上から使えるように公開しているみたいなので,それを使ってみる。


[Event "Portoroz izt"]
[Site "Portoroz izt"]
[Date "1958.08.16"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Fischer, R."]
[Black "Larsen, B."]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B76"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6
{ Larsen was one of the die
hards who refused abandon the Dragon until recently. White's attack almost
plays itself ... weak players even beat Grandmasters with it. I once thumbed
through several issues of Shakhmatny Bulletin, when the Yugoslav Attack
was making its debut, and found the rario was something like nine wins out of
tenin White's favor. Will Black succeed in reinforcing the variation? Time will
tell. } 6.Be3 Bg7 ( 6...Ng4 $2 { still loses to } 7.Bb5+ { . } ) 7.f3 O-O
8.Qd2 Nc6 9.Bc4 Nxd4 (
{ Just how Black can attempt to thread his way to equality is
not clear. Interesting is Donald Byrne's } 9...a5
{ . The strongest replay is } 10.g4 { and if } 10...Ne5 11.Be2 d5 $2 12.g5 $1
{ wins a Pawn. } ) 10.Bxd4 Be6 11.Bb3 Qa5 12.O-O-O b5 ( { After } 12...Bxb3
13.cxb3 $1
{ Black cannot
make anyattacking headway against this particular Pawn configuration. White is
lost inthe King and Pawn ending, it's true, but Black usually gets mated long
beforethen. As Tarrasch put it: "Before the endgame the gods have placed the
middlegame." } ) 13.Kb1 b4 14.Nd5 ( { Weaker is } 14.Ne2 Bxb3 15.cxb3 Rfd8
{ . } ) 14...Bxd5 ( { Bad judgement is } 14...Nxd5 15.Bxg7 Kxg7 16.exd5 Bd7
17.Rde1
{ with a crushing bind. (Suetin-Korchnoi, USSR Championship prelims
1953.) } ) 15.Bxd5 ( { Stronger is } 15.exd5 $1 Qb5 16.Rhe1 a5 17.Qe2 $1
{ (Tal-Larsen, Zurich 1959) where White abandons the attack and plays
forpressure along the e-file instead. } ) 15...Rac8 $2 (
{ The losing move.
After the game Larsen explained he was playing for a win, and therefore rejected the forced draw with }
15...Nxd5 16.Bxg7 Nc3+ 17.bxc3 ( 17.Bxc3 bxc3 18.Qxc3 Qxc3 19.bxc3 Rfc8
{ renders White's extra Pawn useless. } ) 17...Rab8 $1 18.cxb4 Qxb4+ $1
19.Qxb4 Rxb4+ 20.Bb2 Rfb8 { , etc. } ) ( { After } 15...Nxd5
{ , however, I intended simply } 16.exd5 Qxd5 17.Qxb4
{ , keeping the game
alive. } ) 16.Bb3 $1
{ He won't get a second chance to snap off the Bishop! Now
I felt thegame was in the bag if I didn't botch it. I'd won dozens of skittles
games inanalogous positions and had it down to a science: pry open the h-file,
sac, sac... mate! } 16...Rc7
{ This loss of time is unfortunately necessary if
Black is ever to advance his a-Pawn. } ( 16...Qb5 { ? is refuted by } 17.Bxa7
{ . } ) 17.h4 Qb5
{ There's no satisfactory way to impede White's attack. Now
Black is threatening to get some counterplay with ...a5-a4. } ( { If }
17...h5 18.g4 hxg4 ( 18...Rfc8 19.Rdg1 hxg4 20.h5 gxh5 21.fxg4 Nxe4 22.Qf4 e5
23.Qxe4 exd4 24.gxh5 Kh8 25.h6 Bf6 26.Rg7 { wins } ) 19.h5 gxh5 ( 19...Nxh5
20.Bxg7 Kxg7 21.fxg4 Nf6 22.Qh6+ { mates } ) 20.fxg4 Nxe4 ( 20...hxg4 21.Rdg1
e5 22.Be3 Rd8 23.Bh6 ) ( 20...Nxg4 21.Rdg1 Bxd4 22.Rxg4+ hxg4 23.Qh6 ) 21.Qe3
Nf6 ( 21...Bxd4 22.Qxe4 Bg7 23.Rxh5 ) 22.gxh5 e5 23.h6 ) 18.h5 $1
{ There's
no need to lose a tempo with the old-fashioned g4. } 18...Rfc8 ( { On }
18...gxh5 19.g4 $1 hxg4 20.fxg4 $1 Nxe4 21.Qh2 Ng5 22.Bxg7 Kxg7 23.Rd5 Rc5
24.Qh6+ Kg8 25.Rxg5+ Rxg5 26.Qxh7# ) 19.hxg6 hxg6 20.g4 (
{ Not the impatient } 20.Bxf6 $2 Bxf6 21.Qh6 e6 $1
{ (threatening ...Qe5) and Black holds
everything. } ) 20...a5
{ Now Black needs just one more move to get his
counterattack moving. But for the want of a nail the battle was lost... }
21.g5 Nh5 ( { Vasiukov suggests } 21...Ne8 { as a possible defense } ) (
{ (not } 21...a4 22.gxf6 axb3 23.fxg7 bxc2+ 24.Qxc2 e5 25.Qh2 { wins); } ) (
{ but White
crashes through with } 21...Ne8 22.Bxg7 Nxg7 ( 22...Kxg7 23.Qh2 ) 23.Rh6 e6
( 23...a4 24.Qh2 Nh5 25.Rxg6+ ) 24.Qh2 Nh5 25.Bxe6 fxe6 ( 25...Qxg5 26.Rxg6+
Qxg6 27.Bxc8 ) 26.Rxg6+ Ng7 27.Rh1 { , etc. } ) 22.Rxh5
{ Fine wrote: "In
such positions, combinations are as natural as a baby's smile." } 22...gxh5
( 22...Bxd4 23.Qxd4 gxh5 24.g6 Qe5 ( 24...e6 25.Qxd6 ) 25.gxf7+ Kh7 (
25...Kf8 26.Qxe5 dxe5 27.Rg1 e6 28.Bxe6 Ke7 29.Bxc8 Rxc8 30.Rg5 ) 26.Qe3 )
23.g6 e5 ( 23...e6 24.gxf7+ Kxf7 ( 24...Rxf7 25.Bxe6 ) 25.Bxg7 Kxg7 26.Rg1+
Kh7 27.Qg2 Qe5 28.Qg6+ Kh8 29.Rg5 Rg7 30.Rxh5+ Kg8 31.Bxe6+ Kf8 32.Rf5+ Ke7
33.Rf7+ ) 24.gxf7+ Kf8 25.Be3 d5 $1 { A desperate bid for freedom. } (
{ On } 25...a4 26.Qxd6+ Re7 27.Qd8+ Rxd8 28.Rxd8+ Re8 29.Bc5+ { mates. } ) (
{ if } 25...Rd8 26.Bh6 ) 26.exd5 $1 ( 26.Bxd5 Rxc2 $1 ) 26...Rxf7 ( 26...a4
27.d6 axb3 28.dxc7 ) 27.d6 Rf6 ( 27...Rd7 28.Be6 ) ( 27...Rd7 28.Bh6 ) (
27...Rxf3 28.d7 ) 28.Bg5 Qb7 ( 28...Qd7 29.Qd5 Qf7 ( 29...Rf7 30.Be7+ $1 )
30.Bxf6 ) 29.Bxf6 Bxf6 30.d7 Rd8 31.Qd6+ ( { A mistake! } 31.Qh6+ $1
{ forces mate in
three. } ) 1-0

ちなみに,WordPress用のプラグイン(Embed Chessboard)を使ったものは,これ。

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。